|
| Author | Topic: Another flaw in the moon landing hoax theory: Science fiction is more 'real' than science fact |
| Yul Tolbert |
posted 8/27/04 9:27 PM
Some folks say that irrefutable evidence for the moon landing hoax comes from the "fact" that no stars can be seen in the lunar sky. The "reasoning" is that since the moon has no atmosphere, stars should be easily visible on the moon in the day time. And when EXPERTS expain that the brightness of the lunar surface renders stars invisible, these moon landing hoax supports CONTINUE to insist they are right-- even though they tend to know FAR LESS about space technology and astronomy than the experts do. So why is this the case? Well, one possible reason could be that a lot of these folks learn about space science through science fiction. From my point of view, that makes no sense. SF, by definition, is fake. Why would anyone blindly believe that space as portrayed in SF movies and TV shows is real? And if the moon landing were fake, they should look much more like the space images portrayed in SF movies and TV shows. Unfortunately, things seem to be backwards here. Space as portrayed in SF is considered real, but space as portrayed in NASA footage is considered fake. Kia fus^aj^o! |
| julian w thompson |
posted 8/28/04 12:02 AM
I love that because the flag is waving(because of the wires holding it up) that the wind is blowing on the moon. Julian |
|
|