|
| Author | Topic: Vetting of Liverpool Sets |
| Dag Griffiths |
posted 11/30/07 11:31 AM
A recent set from Liverpool, played on 20th November, had clearly not been been properly vetted. Such a poor approach to vetting does nothing to encourage people to turn out week after week. For full details of all the points of contention visit the web link provided. http://www.sfquiz.org.uk/wrong07 Southport & Formby Quiz League |
| Dag Griffiths |
posted 11/30/07 11:34 AM
Sorry! Correction to weblink http://www.sfquiz.org.uk/wrong07.htm Southport & Formby Quiz League |
| Keith Clare |
posted 12/9/07 2:20 PM
It seems very appropriate with so few details to check that Dag got the link wrong, it seems the Southport Quiz League are not infallible after all. |
| Andy Chadwick |
posted 12/17/07 1:38 PM
Because of the consistent lack of balance to quizzes and frequency of poorly constructed questions/answers I have felt for a long time that proper vetting does not take place. I recently came across a set of questions that we (CTK Siblings) had recently submitted.The wording of approx. 75% of the questions had been altered for no apparent reason, some answers had been changed from what was correct to an incorrect one and some questions/answers were changed completely, destroying the balance of the questions. It is embarrassing to know that what is now a poor and unbalanced quiz has been credited to us!Does this sort of "vetting" take place all the time? If so it is not surprising that there are complaints about quizzes! |
|
|