In the May 1890, Zion's Watch Tower, Charles Taze Russell published a more detailed "history" article regarding the early days of the organization. (It is posted in its entirety in a separate thread).
These excerpts are Charles Taze Russell's words regarding his relationship with John H. Paton:
"... I at once wrote to
Mr. Barbour, informing him of our harmony on other points and desiring to
know particularly why, and upon what
Scriptural evidences, he held that Christ's presence and the harvesting of the Gospel age dated from the Autumn of 1874. The answer showed that my surmise had been correct, viz.: that the time arguments, chronology, etc., were the same as used by Second Adventists in 1873, and explained how Mr. Barbour and Mr. J. A. Paton of Michigan, a co-worker with him, had been regular Second Adventists up to that time, and that when the date 1874 had passed without the world being burned, and without their seeing Christ in the flesh, they were for a time dumb-founded. ...
But there were no books or other publications setting forth the time-prophecies as then understood, so I paid Mr. Barbour's expenses to come to see me at Philadelphia (where I had business engagements during the summer of 1876), to show me fully and Scripturally, if he could, that the prophecies indicated 1874 as the date at which the Lord's presence and the harvest began. He came, and the evidences satisfied me. ...
I therefore at once resolved upon a vigorous campaign for the truth. I determined to curtail my business cares and give my time as well as means to the great harvest work. Accordingly, I sent Mr. Barbour back to his home, with money and instructions to prepare in concise book form the good tidings so far as then understood, including the time features, while I closed out my Philadelphia business preparatory to engaging in the work, which I afterward did, traveling and preaching. ...
After a time I conceived the idea of adding another harvest laborer and sent for Mr. Paton, who promptly responded and
whose traveling expenses were met in the same manner.
But noticing how quickly people seemed
to forget what they had heard, it soon became evident that while the meetings were useful in awakening interest, a monthly journal was needed to hold that interest and develop it. It therefore seemed to be the Lord's will that one of our number should settle somewhere and begin again the regular issuing of the "Herald of the Morning". I suggested that Mr. Barbour do this, as he had experience as a type-setter and could therefore do it most economically, while Mr. Paton and I would continue to travel and contribute to its columns as we should find opportunity. ...
But while I was thus helped to clearer
views and brighter hopes, and while I
diligently endeavored to help others, the Spring of 1878 proved far from a blessing to Mr. Barbour and to many under his influence. ...
To our painful surprise Mr. Barbour
soon after wrote an article for the Herald denying the doctrine of the atonement-- ...
Immediately I wrote an article for the Herald in contradiction of the error, showing the necessity "that one die for all"-- "the just for the unjust"--and how Christ fulfilled all this as it had been written, and that consequently God could be just and forgive and release the sinner from the very penalty he had justly imposed (Rom. 3:26.) I also wrote to Mr. Paton, calling his attention to the fundamental character of the doctrine assailed, and pointing out how the time and circumstances all corresponded with the parable of the one who took off the wedding garment when just about to partake of the wedding feast. He replied that he had not seen it in so strong a light before, that Mr. B. had a strong, dogmatic way of putting things which had for the time overbalanced him. I urged that, seeing now the importance of the doctrine, he also write an article for the "Herald", which, in no uncertain tone, would give his witness for the precious blood of Christ, which he did. Those
articles appeared in the issues of the "Herald" from July to December, 1878. ...
I therefore, after a most careful though unavailing effort to reclaim the erring, withdrew entirely from the "Herald of the Morning" and from further fellowship with Mr. B. ...
I therefore understood it to be the Lord's will that I should start another journal in which the standard of the cross should be lifted high, the doctrine of the ransom defended, and the good tidings of great joy proclaimed asextensively as possible. Acting upon this leading of the Lord, I gave up traveling, and in July, 1879, the first number of "Zion's Watch Tower and
Herald of Christ's Presence" made its appearance. ...
For a time we had a most painful experience: the readers of the "Herald" and of the TOWER were the same, ...
It was at this time that Mr. Adams espoused the views of Mr. Barbour and likewise forsook the doctrine of the ransom. And, true to our interpretation of the parable of the wedding garment as given at the time, Mr. Barbour and Mr. Adams, having cast off the wedding garment of Christ's righteousness,
went out of the light into the outer darkness of the world on the subjects once so clearly seen--namely, the time and manner of the Lord's presence; and since then for ten years they have been expecting Christ, Spring or Fall, down to the present Spring, which was their latest disappointment.
During this ordeal, or we might truly
call it battle, for the cross of Christ, we had the earnest co-operation of Mr. Paton, who, up to the Summer of 1881, was an appreciated co-laborer and defender of
the doctrine of coming blessings through Christ based upon the ransom for all given at Calvary. The book "The Three Worlds" having been for some time out of print, it seemed as if either another edition of that, or else a new book covering the same features, should be gotten out. Mr. Paton agreed to get it ready for the press and Mr. Jones offered to pay all the expenses incident to its printing and binding and to give Mr. Paton as many copies of the book as he could sell, as remuneration for his time spent in preparing the matter, provided I would agree to advertise it liberally and gratuitously in the TOWER--well knowing that there would be a demand for it if I should recommend it, and that his outlay would be sure to return with profit. I not only agreed to this but contributed
to Mr. Paton's personal expenses in connection with the publishing, as well as
paid part of the printer's bill at his
solicitation.
In the end I alone was at any financial
loss in connection with that book, called "Day Dawn", the writer and publisher both being gainers financially, while I did all the introducing by repeated
advertisements in the TOWER as well as in "Food for Thinking Christians", of which over a million copies were circulated. We need to give these particulars, because of certain one-side and only partial statements of facts and
misrepresentations, which have recently been published and circulated in tract form by Mr. Paton, who is also now an advocate of that "other gospel" of which the cross of Christ is not the center, and which denies that he "bought us with his own precious blood." Mr. P. has gotten out another book, which, though called by the same name as the one we introduced, being on another and a false foundation, I cannot and do not recommend, but which I esteem misleading sophistry, tending to undermine the whole structure of the Christian system: yet retaining a sufficiency of the truths which we once held in common to make it palatable and dangerous to all not rooted and grounded upon the ransom rock. ...
The little history of the way in which
Mr. Paton came to turn from us and the
ransom, to oppose that which he once
clearly saw and advocated, is important, as it became the occasion of another sifting or testing of the WATCH TOWER readers, by that time a much larger number; because Mr. Paton had been a respected brother and co-worker with us, and because as a traveling representative of the TOWER and its doctrines, his expenses being met in part by TOWER subscriptions and renewals, as well as by money from me, he was personally known to a larger number of the readers than was the editor of the TOWER. It came about thus:--
In the year 1881, Mr. Barbour, still
publishing the Herald, and still endeavoring to overthrow the doctrine of the ransom, finding that on a preaching tour I had used a diagram of the Tabernacle to illustrate how Christ's sacrifice was typified in the sacrifices of typical Israel, etc., wrote an article on the atonement, in which he undertook to show that the sacrifices of the Day of Atonement typified almost anything else than what they do typify. ...
I saw at once that these new developments would probably prove a stumbling block to some, as well as a great blessing to others who were ready for it. Instead, therefore, of publishing it in the next TOWER, I determined to first present the matter privately to the more prominent brethren; --remembering Paul's course in a similar matter.-- Gal. 2:2. Accordingly I sent invitation and the
money necessary for traveling expenses to four of the more prominent brethren, requesting a conference. Mr. Paton from Michigan was one of the four, and the
only one who rejected the fresh rays of
light. Nor could he find any fault with
the exegesis, though urged, as all were, to state anything which might seem inconsistent or to quote any passages of Scripture thought to be in conflict. But there were none, and every question only demonstrated the strength of the position
more fully. I therefore urged that what was beyond the criticism of those most familiar with the plan of God must be the truth, and ought to be confessed and taught at any cost, and especially when it arranged and ordered all the other features of truth so beautifully. I pointed out, too, how necessary it was to a logical holding of the ransom, to see just what this showed-- viz.: the distinctions of nature --that our Lord left a higher nature, and took a lower nature, when he was made flesh, and that the object in that change of nature was, that he might, as a man, a perfect man, give himself a ransom for the first perfect man, Adam, and thus redeem Adam, and all lost in him. I also showed how, as a reward for this great work, he was given the divine nature in his resurrection--a nature still higher than the glorious one he had left, when he became a man. But either his mental vision or his heart was weak, and he never took the step, and before long, alas! he too, as we had foreseen and forewarned him would be the natural course, forsook the doctrine of the ransom. Yet he still uses the word, ransom, while denying the idea conveyed by the word, nor can he give the word any other definition, or otherwise dispute the correctness of the meaning, which we attach to it-- which may be found in any English dictionary and is true to the significance of the Greek word which it translates.
Notwithstanding our best endeavors to
save him he drifted farther and farther
away, until I was obliged to refuse his articles for the TOWER for the same reason that obliged me to refuse to longer spend the Lord's money entrusted to me to assist Mr. Barbour to spread the same pernicious theory.
It was about this time that Mr. Jones
informed me that the copies of the book
"Day Dawn" which I had purchased last
were all that were left; and announcing it so that no more orders for it might come to the TOWER office, I took occasion to promise MILLENNIAL DAWN, which should present the Plan of the Ages in the clearer, more orderly manner made possible by the new light shed upon every feature of it by the lessons from the Tabernacle.
About this time Mr. Paton concluded that he would publish another "Day Dawn", revised to harmonize with his new views ignoring the ransom, ignoring justification
and the need of either, and teaching
that all men will be everlastingly saved-- not in any sense as the result of any sacrifice for their sin by Christ, but as a result of each one's crucifying sin in himself-- the Law under which the poor Jews tried to commend themselves to God, but which justified none.
During this time I was busied by an
immense work known to many of you--
the issue and circulation of over 1,400,000 copies of the two pamphlets entitled
"FOOD FOR THINKING CHRISTIANS" andthe "TABERNACLE TEACHINGS", whose united matter was in sum about the same as Dawn, Vol. I.; and besides this I was flooded with thousands of joyous and joy-giving letters, from those who had gotten and were reading the pamphlets thus distributed, and asking questions and more reading matter. To add to our throng, financial complications came, and thus for four years I was hindered from fulfilling my promise of MILLENNIAL DAWN. Nor will our promise be fulfilled for several years yet; for though two volumes are now out and a third on the way, I purpose several more, as the Lord shall give grace and strength, in connection with the other features of his work entrusted to my care. But because, during those four years in which we were struggling through an immense amount of labor and many draw-backs (all cheerfully undergone for the sake of the Lord and his saints), when each year we hoped afresh to be able to gather the hours necessary to complete the first volume of MILLENNIAL DAWN, and after the old edition was exhausted, notified all applicants that the "Day Dawn" advertised and recommended by us was out of print and could no longer be supplied, I have
been made the target of innumerable petty misrepresentations too small to notice, and malicious insinuations told in a sly but slanderous manner and circulated in print, which a noble nature would disdain, but which are often successful, as intended, in stirring up bitterness, and injuring the influence of the truth. What do I do about it? I thank the Lord for the privilege of suffering some of the reproaches of Christ and the cross, and for grace sufficient that none of these things move me from the utmost determination to always hold up Christ and him crucified, as the Redeemer, who in due time shall restore whosoever wills to all that was lost in Adam. ...
Another chapter in our experience needs
to be told, as it marks another shaking
and sifting. Mr. A. D. Jones proposed to start a paper on the same line as the
WATCH TOWER, to republish some of the simpler features of God's plan and to be a sort of missionary and primary teacher to draw attention to the TOWER, etc.
Knowing him to be clear on the subject
of the ransom, we bade him God speed
and introduced a sample copy of his paper, ZION'S DAY STAR (now for some years discontinued), to our nearly ten thousand readers --only to stumble some of them into rankinfidelity and others into the rejection ofthe ransom. For though the DAY STAR for a few months steered a straight course and maintained the same position as the TOWER with reference to the ransom, and for the same reason refused the no-ransom articles sent for its columns by Mr. Paton, yet within one year it had repudiated Christ's atoning sacrifice, and within another year had gone boldly into infidelity and totally repudiated all the rest of the Bible as well as that which teaches the fall in Adam and the ransom therefor in Christ. ..."