|
|
|
|
| Author | Topic: DOCTRINAL HISTORY: 1871-1881 |
|
George Storrs (Moderator) |
posted 5/22/01 6:05 PM
In this February 1881 Zion's Watch Tower article, C T Russell provides a history, from a doctrinal prospective, of the early Bible Students from 1871 to 1881.
at the steps of progress, and let all notice that the progress is not only forward but upward; i.e., the tendency is from the natural to the spiritual. We will look, not at any one person's experience, but at what serves to show the advance of the knowledge of truth for ten years past. Looking back to 1871, we see that many of our company were what are known as Second Adventists, and the light they held briefly stated, was that there would be a second advent of Jesus-- that he would come to bless and immortalize the saints, to judge the world and to burn up the world and all the wicked. This, they claimed would occur in 1873, because the 6,000 years from the creation of Adam were complete then.
|
|
George Storrs (Moderator) |
posted 5/22/01 6:35 PM
(Article Continued)
But the angels' language seemed peculiar--this same Jesus as though there had been another Jesus: Examination revealed the fact, that Jesus since His resurrection is a totally different being from the Jesus who died; that a great change had taken place. While before his death he had been the "man Christ Jesus" having the form of a servant and perfect human powers, etc., and yet none but human powers, except as the Father's power was operated and manifested through him: (John 14:10.) Yet now, since his resurrection he claims divine powers not as the Father in him, but as His own, saying--"All power in heaven and in earth is given unto me" and he is no longer a natural, but a spiritual body--"It was sown a natural body, raised a spiritual body-- sown mortal raised immortal and exercising powers peculiar to his new conditions, he would appear and disappear and they could not tell whence he came nor whither he went; thus personally illustrating his own teachings to Nicodemus: "That which is born of the Spirit is Spirit. (Jesus was the first born from the dead to the spiritual plane--"by the Spirit.") The wind bloweth where it listeth and thou hearest the sound thereof but can'st not tell whence it cometh nor whither it goeth; so is every one that is born of the Spirit." (Jno. 3:8).
When it was understood that "this same Jesus" was a spiritual body, unseen except by the performance of a miracle, the saying of the angels was perfectly clear.
Just at this time we met with a sad and very severe trial: A brother of influence and ability among us, departed from the very foundation of all faith, claiming that he did not need any one to pay the penalty for his sins, as he and all others did that for themselves when they died--in a word, that the act of dying was the payment of sin, and that having died they all forthwith had a right to life, and in consequence of that right all would be resurrected. [The argument was specious and led astray many who had not recognized that the race was deprived of life because all were sinners, and that all must continue dead forever unless a ransom for sin had been given, and that "Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures," and that his right to restore to life by a resurrection was by virtue of having paid the price-- or penalty "in his own body on the tree," when as Daniel had said "in the midst of the week" he made an end of sin"--"made reconciliation for iniquity."]
|
|
George Storrs (Moderator) |
posted 5/22/01 6:50 PM
(Article Continued)
We saw that all who ever become members of the divine family on the spiritual plane must lose the fleshly being and nature first: that as the bullock was a type of Jesus' earthly-human nature laid down as a ransom, so the two goats represented the church which "fills up the measure of the afflictions of Christ which are behind." We saw that the overcomers, "the little flock" of the church was typified by the Lord's goat which in every particular followed in the footsteps of the bullock as we are to walk in the footsteps of Christ, our example. And we saw how the second company, alas, the "great company of Christians, fail to thus crucify and offer themselves, and must be "sent away" (as was the scapegoat) into great tribulation "for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may be saved." This led to searching inquiry: Am I a sharer in Christ's sufferings, being made conformable unto his death? Am I a living sacrifice?--resulting, we hope, in "a closer walk with God" on the part of some.
and we found the watery grave to be a very beautiful type, or illustration of our dying to the fleshly or human nature, yet that it is not the reality; and though we shall still use the water symbol as we think the Lord desires, and with still deeper pleasure since we see its perfect meaning, yet we now see and appreciate the baptism referred to by Paul as the essential one; in which a man being planted would surely be in Christ's likeness in THE (first) resurrection-- "For if we have been planted together in the likeness of His death we shall be also in the likeness of His resurrection." (Rom. 6:5.) This taken in connection with the other statements of the same apostle--that we are to be made conformable unto His death if we would be in His likeness in the (first) resurrection--must be dead with Him if we would live with Him--must suffer with Him if we would reign with Him--shows us plainly that Paul referred to the same baptism into death of which Jesus spoke, when He said to His disciples who asked to sit in His throne of glory: "Are ye indeed able (willing --the ability comes of God) to drink of the cup that I shall drink of and to be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with"--death. This is our incentive to "both labor and suffer reproach;" that we may honor Him and bless others, and receive the crown of life and glory.
There must be something at this time to which the apostle refers calculated to make some draw back from the aforementioned light. Brethren, "cast not away your confidence which hath great recompence of reward." We surely have every reason for greater confidence than ever in the correctness of our position as we call to mind our leading in the past. "We are not of them that draw back." |
| George Storrs (Moderator) |
posted 1/24/03 9:49 AM
[This message has been edited on 01/24/2003] |
| George Storrs (Moderator) |
posted 1/24/03 9:49 AM
[This message has been edited on 01/24/2003] |
| George Storrs (Moderator) |
posted 1/24/03 9:49 AM
[This message has been edited on 01/24/2003] |
| GSTORRS |
posted 10/18/03 1:23 PM
[This message has been edited on 12/03/2003] |
| GSTORRS |
posted 12/2/03 2:52 PM
[This message has been edited on 12/03/2003] |
| GSTORRS |
posted 3/28/04 6:30 AM
[This message has been edited on 09/14/2006] |
| Bruce |
posted 3/28/07 7:17 PM
I have posted the first thrid of my notes of Nelson Barbour at TruthHistory.blogspot.com. I invite comments but not doctrinal discussion. I am seeking additional insight and facts, not controversy. The post is temporary. I've omited footnotes. It is text only. |
| Sergio |
posted 5/22/07 8:31 AM
Russell stated in "Truth Is Stranger Than Fiction" that he had some medical knowledge. Menta Sturgeon also made that statement in his narration of Russell last days. Could it be that he learnt this from Barbour? http://tjdefendidos.org |
|
|